The Confusion Tax: Why Lack of Trust is Costing the Secondary Device Market Billions

Last week in the Apkudo-sponsored session at Mobile Disrupt in Miami, our panel discussed how a systemic lack of trust in the secondary device market translates directly into lost revenue. Moderated by Simon Bryant of FDM CCS Insight, the panel featured Josh Matthews, CEO and Co-Founder of Apkudo; Craig Feely, Head of Galaxy Value Innovation North America at Samsung; and Sean Cleland, VP of Mobility at B-Stock.

The consensus? The secondary market is ready for a massive trust upgrade, and the Device  Passport™ is the tool that will unlock it.

‍

The "Confusion Tax" Striking Consumers

Simon opened the session by introducing new, ongoing consumer research conducted by FDM CCS Insight in partnership with Apkudo. Spanning focus groups across Japan, Germany, the UK, and the US (with a quantitative phase currently underway), the study aims to quantify a phenomenon the industry has long felt but rarely measured: The Confusion Tax.

When shoppers don’t understand what a "Good" device actually means, or whether battery health numbers are reliable, they don't just proceed cautiously. They change their behavior in ways that bleed revenue from the industry:

• They delay or entirely abandon purchases.
• They trade up to pricier new models they don’t actually need.
• They switch away from refurbished channels altogether.

The early data show a massive opportunity for the first movers who solve this. Across all markets surveyed, when consumers were shown a mockup of a Device Passport for a used device, the reaction was unanimous: they said they would never buy a used phone without that level of detail again.

FDM CCS Insight continues to survey consumers to gain a deeper understanding of the perceived value of a Device Passport, and the final quantitative findings will soon provide a definitive, defensible look at exactly how much this confusion tax is costing the ecosystem. (Register your interest to receive the report once available.)

‍

Demystifying the Digital Product Passport, in Plain English

Because Digital Product Passport (DPP) can sound abstract and is backed by a 400-page EU regulation, Apkudo's Josh Matthews broke down the concept into plain English on stage.

The Travel Passport Analogy: "Think of the passport you carry when you travel. It gets a physical stamp every time you cross a border. A Device Passport works the same way, except the 'stamps' happen digitally at every major milestone of a device's life: manufacturing, first sale, software updates, insurance claims, trade-in, refurbishment, and resale."

Beneath the surface, Josh explained, a DPP relies on two simple mechanisms:

1. Traceability: Documenting exactly what raw materials and components went into making the thing.
2. Tracking: Documenting exactly what happened to the thing after it was made.

In the context of the device industry, Apkudo refers to every stage of a device's lifecycle—refurbishment, trade-in, logistics—as a "program." The business processes within those programs generate events, and the Device Passport simply tracks and traces those events. Crucially, every data point carries a confidence metric. A device graded yesterday by an objective robot inherently carries more trust than one graded three months ago by a subjective human.

‍

Key Takeaways from the Panel

The conversation highlighted that trust doesn't just break down at the consumer level; it is an active friction point across the entire B2B supply chain. Here are the highlights from the panel's discussion:

• B2B Deals Rely on "Marketing Words" Rather Than Facts: Sean noted that the wholesale market currently relies heavily on hedging and guesswork. Buyers on the B-Stock marketplace frequently retest lots because they don't trust the original triage data, creating immense operational inefficiency.
• Automation Raises the Ceiling on Trust: Manual grading accuracy tops out at around 40%-60% because human operators have bad days, get tired, or interpret guidelines differently. Craig noted that automated robotics remove this subjectivity, and the radical transparency of a Device Passport will force bad actors out of the market because "there will be nowhere left to hide."
• A 10% to 20% Lift in Residual Value: Transparency isn't just an ethical win; it has a direct financial ROI. Craig cited early pilot data showing a 10% to 20% increase in residual value when buyers have verified transparency into a device's condition. And, because used-device buyers typically do 2x to 3x as much research as new-device buyers, a trusted data source drastically shortens the buying cycle, moving inventory faster.
• The GSMA as a Unique Global Advantage: Josh emphasized that the mobile telecom sector is "tremendously fortunate" compared to other industries trying to figure out Digital Product Passports. While other sectors are struggling to build a centralized identity framework from scratch, the mobile industry already has a single, independent global authority that issues a device’s identity at birth: the GSMA. Because it already manages the root identity set, the Type Allocation Code (TAC), the GSMA serves as the natural, completely neutral steward to oversee the passport as a device moves through the supply chain. This trust and neutrality is the foundation behind the GSMA Foundry Device Homologation Pilot, powered by Apkudo. The pilot tackles a basic but critical hurdle for regulators globally—homologation (verifying that a device was actually manufactured as claimed)—while using data spaces to ensure companies maintain full sovereignty over what granular information they share.
• Universal Standards are Non-Negotiable: For a global passport to function, the industry must speak the same language. Craig, who co-chairs the CTIA grading standards, emphasized that a "Galaxy S21" must mean the exact same thing across all carriers, OEMs, and countries, or the data becomes untenable.

‍

The Next Three Years

When asked what single change the industry needs to make in the next three years to achieve true transparency, the panel's conclusion was clear: complete ecosystem participation. From the OEM at birth to the recycler at end-of-life, every stakeholder must contribute to the ground truth of the device.

Trust is no longer an abstract concept; it is a measurable metric that directly impacts conversion rates, residual values, and capital efficiency. The technical infrastructure is ready, the regulatory tailwinds are blowing, and the financial upside is proven. The only question left is how quickly the industry will adopt it.

Want to hear the full breakdown on data spaces, fraud prevention, and the future of the circular economy?

[WATCH THE COMPLETE CONVERSATION ON YOUTUBE HERE]

‍